Conflict and Preference between Evidence in the Judiciary: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study

Type:	Secondary Source
Author:	Dr. Mishal Awad Al-Salmi
Summary:	By AI This study summarizes the provisions regarding conflict and preference among evidences according to the Hanbali school of thought and its ruling. The conflict and preference among evidences are considered issues related to means of proof in the judiciary, which are necessary for judges, attorneys, and researchers in the field of law. The researcher has reached several findings and recommendations. Among the findings: many issues of conflict and preference are left to the discretion of the judge,...

Type:

Secondary Source

Author:

Dr. Mishal Awad Al-Salmi

Summary:

By AI

This study summarizes the provisions regarding conflict and preference among evidences according to the Hanbali school of thought and its ruling. The conflict and preference among evidences are considered issues related to means of proof in the judiciary, which are necessary for judges, attorneys, and researchers in the field of law. The researcher has reached several findings and recommendations. Among the findings: many issues of conflict and preference are left to the discretion of the judge,...